The opinion
*664
Stacy, C. J.,
after stating the case: The judgment sustaining the demurrers must be affirmed on authority of
Jenkins v. Griffith,
189 N. C., 633 , and
Hipp v. Fenrall,
173 N. C., 167 .
Jenkins v. Griffith
was written under a
per curiam
opinion, but this in no way impairs its force as a precedent. It is supported by full citation of authorities. Ordinarily, a
per curiam
is the opinion of the Court in a case in which we are all of one mind, and where the questions presented are controlled by previous decisions, or otherwise they are of such a nature that we do not deem it necessary, or beneficial to the profession, to elaborate them by an extended discussion.
Clarke v. Assurance Co.,
146 Pa. St., 561;
Minor v. Fike,
77 Kan., 806 , 93 Pac., 264 .
Affirmed.