Opinion

State v. . Gentry

  • 183 N.C. 826
  • 112 S.E. 427
  • 1922 N.C. LEXIS 378
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Jun 2, 1922
Status
Published
On the bench
ADAMS, J.
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 42.5%

The opinion

The plaintiffs excepted to his Honor's refusal to permit recovery of $2,500 as a forfeiture to the State for the use of the county under the provisions of C.S. 8051. The exception is not tenable. The penalty prescribed may be recovered (1) where upon demand the sheriff fails, neglects, or refuses to make settlement or to render an account to the county treasurer and auditing committee, or (2) where after account had or settlement made the sheriff fails, neglects, or refuses to pay over the amount rightfully found to be due. In the record neither of these conditions appears. There was a repleader before the referee, and in accordance with the amended pleadings, the case was heard and determined upon the single theory that the defendant "had failed to pay over" the amount which the plaintiffs claimed to be due. Davenport v. McKee , 98 N.C. 500 ; Williamson v. Jones , 127 N.C. 178 .

On the plaintiffs' appeal there is

No error.

STACY, J., not sitting.

(830)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.