Opinion

Rothchild v. . McNichol

  • 121 N.C. 284
  • 28 S.E. 364
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Sep 5, 1897
Status
Published
On the bench
PER CURIAM.
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 42.3%

The opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for the writ of

certiorari

must be denied. The petition is not verified as required by Rule 42, nor is the transcript of the record proper filed, nor good reason given for the failure to do so.

Burrell

v.

Hughes,

120 N. C., 277 , and cases cited;

Brown

v.

House,

119 N. C., 622 ;

Parker

v.

Railroad,

at this term. Indeed no excuse is shown why the transcript of the whole record, including the case on

*285

appeal, is not filed. The motion for

certiorari

must be denied, yet, as no motion to dismiss has been made, it can still be docketed at any time this Term, if before such, motion is made.

Smith

v.

Montague,

at this term;

Triplett

v.

Foster,

113 N. C., 389 . Indeed, if the cause was tried below since this Term began, it can be docketed regularly at next Term.

Motion denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.