Opinion

Brown v. Rhinehart Bros.

  • 112 N.C. 772
  • 16 S.E. 840
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Feb 5, 1893
Status
Published
On the bench
MaoRae
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 42.3%

The opinion

Whatever may have been the former rulings upon the power of the judge to set aside judgments under section 274 of The Code, we must consider it settled by the decisions in Beck v. Bellamy , 93 N.C. 129 , and Clemmons v. Field , 99 N.C. 400 , followed in Flowers v. Alford , 111 N.C. 248 , that where the judgment was rendered upon a verdict the motion will be denied, and that therefore it was error in his Honor to have set aside the verdict and judgment for excusable neglect. But as the same result will be reached, and the verdict and judgment be set aside as irregular, the appellant will not recover his costs upon the appeal. It is so ordered.

ERROR.

Cited: Morrison v. McDonald , 113 N.C. 331 ; Junge v. MacKnight , 135 N.C. 109 ; Mann v. Hall , 163 N.C. 53 , 60 ; Forbis v. Lumber Co. , 165 N.C. 409 ; Hyder v. R. R. , 167 N.C. 586 . *Page 514

(778)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.