Opinion

John v. . Allen

  • 207 N.C. 520
  • 177 S.E. 634
  • 1935 N.C. LEXIS 194
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Jan 1, 1935
Status
Published
Author
Staoy
On the bench
Staoy
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 86.8%

The opinion

*521

Staoy, 0. J.

Tbe statutes under which the plaintiff seeks to compel the issuance of a voucher and the levy of a tax, chs. 88 and 361, Public-Local Laws 1933, deal only with county vouchers and county obligations. The application for writs of

mandamus

was, therefore, properly denied.

Rollins v. Rogers,

204 N. C., 308 , 168 S. E., 206 ;

Comrs. v. Lacy,

174 N. C., 141 , 93 S. E., 482 .

Mandamus

is available against a board of county commissioners only to compel the board to do something which it is its duty to do without it. The writ confers no new authority. The party seeking it must have a clear legal right to demand it, and the board must be under a legal obligation to perform the act sought to be enforced. Neither of these prerequisites appears in the instant case.

Powers v. Asheville,

203 N. C., 2 , 164 S. E., 324 .

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.