Opinion

Hulburt v. Walker

  • 258 N.Y. 8
  • 179 N.E. 34
  • 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 788
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Dec 4, 1931
Status
Published
Author
Crane
On the bench
Crane, Kellogg
Cited by
17 cases

“This principle of [the validity of assignments in blank] does not apply to instruments, other than those which are negotiable, or quasi negotiable by custom.”

How later courts described this case

  • “This principle of [the validity of assignments in blank] does not apply to instruments, other than those which are negotiable, or quasi negotiable by custom.”
  • “[A] writing, not containing, when signed, words essential to a conveyance, is not an instrument of conveyance.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Crane, J.

(concurring). I concur in the result on the ground that the mortgagees were put on notice by the form of the deed which came into the possession of their agent.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur with Kellogg, J.; Crane, J., concurs in result in memorandum.

Judgment affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.