Opinion

Borelli v. International Railway Co.

  • 240 N.Y. 54
  • 147 N.E. 356
  • 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 699
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Mar 3, 1925
Status
Published
Author
Pound
On the bench
Andrews, Pound
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 41.8%

The opinion

Pound, J. (dissenting).

I dissent on the ground that the system of transportation between New York and Canada adopted by appellant brings it under the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability A.ct which contains no pertinent exceptions applicable to street rail

*63

ways engaged in interstate or foreign commerce.

(Spokane & I. E. R. R. Co. v. Campbell,

241 U. S. 497, 507 .)

Hiscock, Ch. J., Crane and Lehman, JJ., concur with Andrews, J.; Pound, J., dissents in memorandum, in which Cardozo, J., concurs; McLaughlin, J., absent.

Order reversed, etc.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.