Opinion

Midland Park Coal Lumber Co., Inc. v. Terhune

  • 137 N.J.L. 603
  • 61 A.2d 76
  • 1948 N.J. LEXIS 323
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Sep 3, 1948
Status
Published
On the bench
PER CURIAM.
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 74.1%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion below excepting that portion dealing with the authority to regulate by zoning the use of vacant lands in general. Since the land in dispute is to be used in conjunction with presently owned yards and buildings of the appellant, both premises are regarded as a unit and subject to the prevailing zoning restrictions.

For affirmance

— The Chief Justice, Bobine, Heher, Wacheneelb, Burling, Jacobs, . Wells, Dill, Freunb, McLean, JJ. 10.

For reversal

— The Chancellor, Schettino, JJ. 2.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.