Opinion

Figula v. Board of Adjustment of Passaic

  • 136 N.J.L. 638
  • 57 A.2d 246
  • 1948 N.J. LEXIS 290
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Jan 29, 1948
Status
Published
On the bench
PER CURIAM.
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered

per curiam

in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance

— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Heher, Wachenfeld, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 11.

For reversal

— None.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.