predecessor of N.J.S.A. 18A:28-5(c), R.S. 18:13-16(c), inspired by just such "artificial splitting of the period of employment ... to avoid application of the tenure statute to a regularly employed, full-time teacher ..."
How later courts described this case
- predecessor of N.J.S.A. 18A:28-5(c), R.S. 18:13-16(c), inspired by just such "artificial splitting of the period of employment ... to avoid application of the tenure statute to a regularly employed, full-time teacher ..."
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Dill, J.
(Concurring.) I vote to reverse in this case solely because respondent does not have the certificate necessary to qualify her as a teacher under the rules and regulations of the Newark Board of Education and for that reason she is not entitled to tenure.
For affirmance
— Donges, J. 1.
For reversal
— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Porter, Colie, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 11.