Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ball v. State Board of Health

  • 325 Mo. 41
  • 26 S.W.2d 773
  • 1930 Mo. LEXIS 418
Court
Supreme Court of Missouri
Filed
Apr 8, 1930
Status
Published
Author
Blair
On the bench
Frank, Blair, Walker
Cited by
11 cases

The opinion

BLAIR, J.

(dissenting). — "While I think that the disposition made of the merits of the case in the majority opinion is correct in the main, I am still of the opinion, as I was on the first appearance of the case, that the State Board of Health did not make a sufficient finding of the guilt of relator, as required by Section 7336, Revised Statutes 1919, to authorize it to revoke relator’s license to practice medicine in this State.

Counsel and the parties are familiar with my views as expressed in an opinion heretofore written. As the reasons there outlined, which I still regard as sound, constitute only an elaboration of the reason for my present inability to concur in the result reached by the majority of the court, I see no necessity for restating them now.

I most respectfully dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.