addressing an argument that a bill’s emergency clause was “merely a conclusion” and holding that the brief emergency statement was valid where it recited an immediate need for increased funding to schools after World War II in the interests of public peace, health, and safety
How later courts described this case
- addressing an argument that a bill’s emergency clause was “merely a conclusion” and holding that the brief emergency statement was valid where it recited an immediate need for increased funding to schools after World War II in the interests of public peace, health, and safety
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
The foregoing opinion by BARRETT. C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur. *Page 953