The opinion
*332
"WILLIAMSON, J.
concurring). — The decision of this case, under the facts shown by the record, lies in the answers to two questions of law: First, has a man a right to conduct a lawful business in a lawful way ? To ask that question is to answer it. Every man has that right. Second, have courts of equity po'wer, by injunction, to prevent forcible interference with a lawful business, lawfully conducted, when the method and degree of forcible interference constitute a continuing nuisance? The answer is that courts of equity now have that power, and have always had it.
I do not understand that either the majority opinion by Goode, J., or the concurring opinion by Graves, J., in any manner infringes upon the constitutional right of freedom of speech. I concur in both.