Opinion

Dobbs v. State

  • 148 Md. 34
  • 129 A. 275
  • 1925 Md. LEXIS 3
Court
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Filed
Apr 9, 1925
Status
Published
On the bench
Bond, Patti, Urner, Adkins, Oíeetjtt, Digges, Parke, Walsh
Cited by
34 cases
Authority
More cited than 97.7%

applying the inducement rule to the conduct of the State's Attorney, who told the defendant, " 'Tell the truth about it. You’ve got nothing to fear if you tell the truth, and you weren't in it' "

How later courts described this case

  • applying the inducement rule to the conduct of the State's Attorney, who told the defendant, " 'Tell the truth about it. You’ve got nothing to fear if you tell the truth, and you weren't in it' "

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

There being, in the opinion of a majority of the Court, error in the rulings involved in the exceptions in this case, relating to the Littman robbery, numbered forty to fifty-nine, inclusive, it is by the Court of Appeals of Maryland this 9th day of April, 1925,

Ordered : That the judgments against each appellant in this case be and the same are hereby reversed and the case remanded as to each for a new trial.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.