Opinion

Kennedy v. Item Co.

  • 213 La. 347
  • 34 So. 2d 886
  • 1948 La. LEXIS 848
Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Filed
Feb 16, 1948
Status
Published
Author
Hamiter
On the bench
Fournet, Hamiter, O'Niell
Cited by
29 cases
Authority
More cited than 39.7%

assessing damages to an attorney for defamatory statements

How later courts described this case

  • assessing damages to an attorney for defamatory statements

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

HAMITER, Justice

(dissenting).

In my opinion the doctrine of privileged comment respecting the efforts of public or quasi-public persons, as enunciated in Flanagan v. Nicholson Publishing Company, 137 La. 588 , 68 So. 964 , L.R.A.1917E, 510, Ann.Cas.1917B, 402 (not since overruled), is appropriate to this case, and the trial judge, I think, properly and correctly applied it in dismissing this suit.

I respectfully dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.