Opinion

Leach v. Exchange State Bank

  • 200 Iowa 185
  • 203 N.W. 31
Court
Supreme Court of Iowa
Filed
Apr 7, 1925
Status
Published
On the bench
Albert, Arthur, De Grape, Evans, Faville, Stevens, Vermilion
Cited by
21 cases

The opinion

I agree with Judge Arthur in his special concurrence, but am disposed to doubt the validity of the statute (Chapter 189, Acts of the Fortieth General Assembly), in so far as it attempts to confer power upon the superintendent of banks to liquidate insolvent banks independently of the courts. If this is the import of the majority opinion, it seems to me that it is an attempt to confer judicial power on a purely administrative officer; but, as this viewpoint is not urged in argument, I wish to note it, to the end that, should the question be brought before us in the future, I do not wish to be held committed on that question by the majority opinion herein. Otherwise, I concur in the majority opinion.

STEVENS, J., being disqualified, takes no part in this decision.

De GRAFF, J., takes no part in this decision.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.