Opinion

Wechsler v. Novak

  • 157 Fla. 703
  • 26 So. 2d 884
  • 1946 Fla. LEXIS 833
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Jul 12, 1946
Status
Published
Author
Brown
On the bench
Chapman, Thomas, Sebring, Terrell, Buford, Brown, Adams
Cited by
13 cases

the general right to contract is subject to limitation that agreement must not violate federal or state constitutions or state statutes or ordinances of a city or town or some rule of the common law

How later courts described this case

  • the general right to contract is subject to limitation that agreement must not violate federal or state constitutions or state statutes or ordinances of a city or town or some rule of the common law

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BROWN, J.,

concurring specially:

The large amounts of this allegedly agreed compensation, and the fact that it was conditioned upon success in getting favorable action by' the board in Washington, inclines me to agree to the foregoing opinion. The' mere employment by a person, or corporation, or a city, of some competent person to represent them and to present legitimate arguments before any one of the many boards and commissions in Washington, in order, if possible, to get favorable action by such a board on any matter vitally important to the protection of their legitimate interests, would seem to be not only lawful but, frequently, vitally necessary.

CHAPMAN, C. J., THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.