Opinion

Stewart v. Stewart

  • 158 Fla. 326
  • 29 So. 2d 247
  • 170 A.L.R. 1073
  • 1946 Fla. LEXIS 577
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Nov 26, 1946
Status
Published
Author
Buford
On the bench
Thomas, Chapman, Brown, Barns, Terrell, Adams, Buford, Fabisinski
Cited by
23 cases

The opinion

BUFORD,

concurring specially:

I concur in what is said and in the conclusion reached in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice BARNS on rehearing granted; but, in addition thereto I am constrained to say that I have carefully studied the record and, as I see it, the record contains a great deal of testimony pro and con which is strong enough to create a very substantial suspicion that the plaintiff has been guilty of adultery but I think the record fails to reveal any

substantial legal

evidence to

establish

the

fact

that he was guilty of adultery. «

*329

For the reasons stated in the majority opinion, and also for this additional reason, I concur in the view that the decree of the Chancellor should be affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.