Opinion

County of Hillsborough v. Kensett

  • 107 Fla. 237
  • 144 So. 393
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Dec 21, 1931
Status
Published
On the bench
Buford, Ellis, Brown, Whitfield, Terrell, Davis
Cited by
21 cases
Authority
More cited than 92.6%

actions for inverse condemnation are subject to both the statute of limitations and the doctrine of laches

How later courts described this case

  • actions for inverse condemnation are subject to both the statute of limitations and the doctrine of laches

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree. It is therefore considered, ordered and decreed by the Court

*239

that the said decree of the Circuit Court he, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.