Opinion

Adams v. Sanford Growers' Credit Corp.

  • 135 Fla. 513
  • 186 So. 239
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Jun 16, 1938
Status
Published
On the bench
Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford, Chapman, Thomas, Compiled, Laws, Rules, Ellis
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 78.2%

The opinion

*514

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Seminole County dismissing, on motion of defendants, appellees here, the amended bill of complaint filed by the appellants in said Circuit Court. The sole assignment of error is that the court below eired in dismissing the amended bill. After due hearing and consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the amended bill was not entirely without equity and that said assignment of error was well taken.

As the court cannot foresee what questions may be presented for decision by further pleadings and proof in this cause in the court below, the Court deems it unnecessary at this time-to discuss and rule upon the somewhat numerous questions' which have been so ably presented and argued in the briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, some of which may be materially changed or entirely eliminated when the evidence is taken.

Taking all of the allegations of the amended bill, which are well pleaded, as being true, which must be done on motion to dismiss, the bill is not without equity, and the order appealed from must be and is hereby accordingly reversed and the cause remanded.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.