Opinion

Star Fruit Co. v. Eagle Lake Growers, Inc.

  • 160 Fla. 130
  • 33 So. 2d 858
  • 1948 Fla. LEXIS 625
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Feb 10, 1948
Status
Published
Author
Thomas
On the bench
Barns, Buford, Chapman, Sebring, Thomas, Adams
Cited by
60 cases

“an unauthorized act which deprives another of his property permanently or for an indefinite time”

How later courts described this case

  • “an unauthorized act which deprives another of his property permanently or for an indefinite time”
  • "[t]he gist of a conversion ... [is] ... not the acquisition of the property of the wrongdoer, but the wrongful deprivation of a person of property to the possession of which he is entitled."
  • reversing because “[t]here was no evidence introduced concerning value” of the specific items allegedly converted
  • “The gist of a conversion has been declared to be not the acquisition of the property of the wrongdoer, but the wrongful deprivation of a person of property to the possession of which he is entitled. A conversion consists of an act in derogation of the plaintiff’s possessory rights, and any wrongful exercise or assumption of authority over another's goods, depriving him of the possession, permanently or for an indefinite time, is a conversion.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

THOMAS, C. J., and ADAMS, J.,

concurring specially:

We concur in the judgment of reversal but are of the opinion that the evidence does not make a case of conversion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.