Opinion

Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Jones

  • 124 Fla. 164
  • 168 So. 803
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Apr 20, 1936
Status
Published
On the bench
Whitfield, Ellis, Brown, Buford, Davis, Terrell
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 50.8%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the Plaintiffs in Error, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is- no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the

*165

said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby-affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.