concluding that “penetration of the female private parts by the private male organ” is an essential element of “carnal intercourse with an unmarried female of previous chaste character under the age of eighteen years”
How later courts described this case
- concluding that “penetration of the female private parts by the private male organ” is an essential element of “carnal intercourse with an unmarried female of previous chaste character under the age of eighteen years”
- defining the portion of section 794.01 applying to females over the age of 10
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
THOMAS,
concurring specially:
I concur in the conclusion that the appellee be tried on the information,'but only for the offense of “assault with intent to have sexual intercourse with an unmarried female under eighteen years of age of previous chaste character.” Bowden v. State (Fla.) 12 So. 2d 887 .