Opinion

Engebretson v. City of San Diego

  • 185 Cal. 475
  • 197 P. 651
  • 1921 Cal. LEXIS 572
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 2, 1921
Status
Published
Author
Angellotti
On the bench
Angellotti, Wilbur
Cited by
21 cases

The opinion

ANGELLOTTI, C. J., Dissenting.

I dissent from the judgment of reversal. To my mind, in view of our conclusion on the question of plaintiff’s right to interest, in which I entirely concur, the complaint did not state a cause of action against the city of San Diego. I think that upon the facts alleged plaintiff’s sole remedy for the collection of his claim which had been duly allowed by the council of the city was by mandate against the auditor, as was decided by the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, division one.

Sloane, J., concurred.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.