Opinion

San Bernardino v. Horton

  • 173 Cal. 396
  • 160 P. 231
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 21, 1916
Status
Published
On the bench
THE COURT.
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

This is an application for a writ of mandate.

The sole question presented is whether a municipality, the city of San Bernardino in this instance, is a "district" within the meaning of that word as used in that part of subdivision f of section 14 of article XIII of the constitution reading as follows: "The legislature shall provide for reimbursement from the general funds of any county to districts therein where loss is occasioned in such districts by the withdrawal from local taxation of property taxed for state purposes only," and in section 32 of an act of the legislature to carry into effect the provisions of section 14 of article XIII of the constitution, approved April 1, 1911 (Stats. 1911, pp. 530, 556).

The court is unanimously of the view that it is not a district within the meaning of the word as used in these provisions.

The application for a writ of mandate is denied.

Rehearing denied.

*Page 398

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.