the statute is “obnoxious to the constitutional provisions guaranteeing equal protection . . . and forbidding confiscation”
How later courts described this case
- the statute is “obnoxious to the constitutional provisions guaranteeing equal protection . . . and forbidding confiscation”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
We concur in the affirmance of the award in this case solely on the ground set forth in the concurring opinion of Justice Shaw.