Opinion

Partridge v. Devoto

  • 148 Cal. 167
  • 82 P. 775
  • 1905 Cal. LEXIS 654
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Oct 27, 1905
Status
Published
Author
Beatty
On the bench
Beatty, Shaw
Cited by
10 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.1%

The opinion

BEATTY, C. J.

I concur in the judgment for the same reasons that induced my dissent from the judgment in the case of

Craig

v. Brown, 114 Cal. 481 , [ 46 Pac. 870 ]. The organizers of a new party can always find a party designation which is wholly distinct from the name of an existing party. The name “Republican” or “Democratic,” though qualified by an epithet, not only may, but inevitably must, deceive some of that class of voters whose protection is the avowed policy of the law, and when every legitimate purpose of the organizers of a new political party can be accomplished by the adoption of a name entirely distinct and which can deceive no one, they should be required, and under a proper construction of the law they are required, to select such a name.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.