Opinion

In Re Gilstrap

  • 171 Cal. 108
  • 152 P. 42
  • 1915 Cal. LEXIS 598
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 30, 1915
Status
Published
Author
Angellotti
On the bench
Angellotti, Shaw, Lawlor
Cited by
11 cases

The opinion

ANGELLOTTI, C. J., Concurring.

I concur in the judgment, and generally in the views expressed in the opinion of Justice Lawlor. That the act involved was intended solely as a regulatory measure designed to regulate the business of

*123

selling ‘ ‘ drugs, nostrums, ointments or any appliances for the treatment of diseases, deformities, or injuries” by

itinerant venders

is very clear to me. I am also satisfied that it cannot be held as matter of law that the legislative judgment as to the amount of fee or charge reasonably necessary for the regulation of

that

business, viz.: one hundred dollars for each half year, is wrong.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.