Opinion

Locke v. Locke

  • 153 Cal. 56
  • 94 P. 244
  • 1908 Cal. LEXIS 417
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 13, 1908
Status
Published
Author
Shaw
On the bench
Shaw, McFarland
Cited by
8 cases

The opinion

SHAW, J., concurring

concur in the judgment. During I the time the plaintiff supported herself she had no cause of action for divorce on the ground of non-support.

(Washburn

v.

Washburn,

9. Cal. 476;

Rycraft

v.

Rycraft,

42 Cal. 445 .) The delay during that time to begin the action could not affect the case, for she then had no right of action. The cause of action she had was for non-support during the year ending in October, 1906. She began the action therefor on November 8, 1906.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.