Opinion

Roche v. Baldwin

  • 135 Cal. 522
  • 65 P. 459
  • 1902 Cal. LEXIS 837
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 18, 1902
Status
Published
On the bench
Henshaw, McFARLAND, Temple, Van Dyke
Cited by
18 cases

The opinion

I concur in the judgment, on the ground that the instruction discussed in the opinion is erroneous and may have been injurious. It rendered it unnecessary for the jury to determine the question of fact in regard to the terms of the employment.

Harrison, J., and Beatty, C.J., concurred.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.