certiorari denied by the United States Supreme Court, 255 U. S. 445 [41 Sup. Ct. 373, 65 L. Ed. 723]
How later courts described this case
- certiorari denied by the United States Supreme Court, 255 U. S. 445 [41 Sup. Ct. 373, 65 L. Ed. 723]
- writ of error dismissed 255 U. S. 445 [41 Sup. Ct. 373, 65 L. Ed. 723]
- nullifying the condition of residency
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
WILBUR, J., Concurring.
I adhere to the views expressed in
Estabrook Co.
v.
Industrial Acc. Com.,
177 Cal. 767 , [ 177 Pac. 848 ], I.do not, therefore, agree with that portion of the opinion of Mr. Justice Lennon discussing that case and the rule of law which it announces. I concur with what is said by Mr. Justice Lennon in reference to the jurisdiction of the state of California. I concur in that portion of his opinion in which he bases the constitutionality of the statute upon the principle announced in
Estate of Johnson, supra.
I agree with the majority of the court in holding that, notwithstanding the language of the statute with reference to residents, by virtue of the federal constitution a nonresident of California, if a citizen of the United States,
*50
is entitled to the same remedies as a resident, and for that reason the Industrial Accident Commission had jurisdiction of the complaint of a resident of California, and would also have jurisdiction of a similar complaint by a nonresident, and that there is, therefore, no such discrimination as is prohibited by the federal constitution.