Opinion

Matter of Dodge

  • 135 Cal. 512
  • 67 P. 973
  • 1902 Cal. LEXIS 836
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 18, 1902
Status
Published
Author
McFARLAND
On the bench
McFarland, Beatty, Van Dyke
Cited by
12 cases

The opinion

McFARLAND, J., concurring.

I concur in the judgment; but I do so solely on the ground that the people of the state, by adopting amendment to the state constitution in. 1896, deliberately yielded up the power to fix the proper compensation of county officers in the city and county of San Francisco. No question as to “municipal affairs” arises in the case. Under the said constitutional amendment the compensation of “county officers” may be fixed in the charter; and “compensation” is as broad a word as could be used in that connection. It might well be argued that it would be good policy for the state to encourage the collection of a tax so difficult to collect as a poll-tax, by allowing extra compensation therefor; but that matter should have been considered when the amendment 8-|- was adopted.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.