Opinion

McColgan v. Bank of California Assn.

208 Cal. 329
281 P. 381
65 A.L.R. 1075
1929 Cal. LEXIS 389

Court: California Supreme Court
Filed: Sep 30, 1929
Status: Published
Author: Waste
On the bench: Preston, Waste
Cited by: 13 cases

The opinion

WASTE, C. J., Concurring.

I concur, but only in so far as the majority opinion rests upon the theory that the transaction between Beamish and the respondent resulted in an equitable lien in favor of the respondent.

Rehearing denied.

All the Justices concurred.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.