The opinion
THOMAS, Justice.
The trial was had by the court.without a jury, and judgment rendered for plaintiffSi
It may be said that the judgment was rendered on June 9, 1931; the appeal was tak
*490
en, and. security for costs given and' approved on May 11, 1932; and the question of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal is presented. Section 6127, Code; Colbert County v. Tennessee Valley Bank, 225 Ala. 632 , 144 So. 803 ; Hildebrand v. First Nat. Bank of Fairfield, 221 Ala. 216 , 128 So. 219 ; Collins Paving Co. v. Holseapple, 221 Ala. 308 , 128 So. 599 ; Thompson v. State ex rel. Reeves, 216 Ala. 348 , 113 So. 296 ; City of Troy v. Murphree, 214 Ala. 118 , 107 So. 83 .
The appeal, taken after the time prescribed by statute, will be dismissed ex mero motu, because this court is without jurisdiction to consider same. Snider v. Funderburk, 209 Ala. 663 , 96 So. 928 ; Boshell v. Phillips, 207 Ala. 628 , 93 So. 576 ; Bickley v. Hays, 183 Ala. 506 , 62 So. 767 .
Appeal dismissed.
ANDERSON, C. X, and BROWN and KNIGHT, XL, concur.