Opinion

Banks v. Peek

  • 249 Ala. 32
  • 29 So. 2d 418
  • 1947 Ala. LEXIS 278
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Feb 13, 1947
Status
Published
Author
Brown
On the bench
Brown, Foster, Stakely, Gardner, Livingston, Lawson, Simpson
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 43.8%

The opinion

On Rehearing.

BROWN, Justice.

The petition or motion termed “Application and' Brief for Rehearing” filed

*36

by appellant does not question the soundness of the opinion and judgment of this court but embodied a statement of fact and seeks the advice of this court, as to whether or not the facts stated constitute a compliance with the mandate of the peremptory writ issued by the Circuit Court of Calhoun County. This is not an application for rehearing within Rule No. 38, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix. Redd Chemical & Nitrate Co. v. W. T. Clay Mercantile Co. et al., 219 Ala. 478 , 122 So. 652 . Moreover the answer to the petition controverts some of the facts stated, presenting questions within the province and power of the circuit court, and it is for that court.to determine whether or not the respondents have - complied with the mandate of the writ. The petition is, therefore, dismissed.

GARDNER, £. J., and LIVINGSTON, LAWSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur!

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.