Opinion

Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Collier

  • 26 Ala. App. 75
  • 154 So. 116
  • 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 227
Court
Alabama Court of Appeals
Filed
May 16, 1933
Status
Published
On the bench
Rice, Samford
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 71.4%

Reversed by Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Collier, 228 Ala. 3 (1933)

The opinion

Parties have a right to frame the issues as suits them both.

In this case, as the issues were framed, as we understand them, they were properly submitted to the jury, whose verdict is amply supported.

The bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all the evidence; hence we assume such a condition of same as to justify each ruling, none of same being inherently and incurably erroneous, to which exception was reserved.

For the same reason we will not review the giving or refusing of written charges.

No prejudicial error having been pointed out, etc., to us, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

SAMFORD, J., not sitting.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.