where the accused was charged with murder as a proximate result of operating a car under the influence of liquor, "[i]t seems to us entirely relevant and competent — perhaps, or possibly, material — to show that he had had some whiskey to drink 3 1/2 or 4 or 5 or 6 hours before the accident"
How later courts described this case
- where the accused was charged with murder as a proximate result of operating a car under the influence of liquor, "[i]t seems to us entirely relevant and competent — perhaps, or possibly, material — to show that he had had some whiskey to drink 3 1/2 or 4 or 5 or 6 hours before the accident"
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
BROWN, Justice.
Petition of Hollis Crump for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case styled Crump v. State, ■191. So. 475.
Writ denied.
ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and FOSTER, JJ., concur.