Opinion

Daniel v. Ormand

  • 231 Ala. 10
  • 163 So. 362
  • 1935 Ala. LEXIS 326
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Jun 27, 1935
Status
Published
Author
Brown
On the bench
Brown, Anderson, Thomas, Bouldin
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 74.4%

The opinion

BROWN, Justice.

The record shows, after demurrer was overruled to some of the special pleas, issue was joined on the plea of the general issue and other special pleas.

At the conclusion of the evidence the court gave the affirmative charge for the defendant.

The appeal to the Court of Appeals was prosecuted to that court on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. It appears that the Court of Appeals has correctly disposed of the case. See Black v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co., 202 Ala. 506 , 80 So. 794 ; Cross v. Esslinger, 133 Ala. 409 , 32 So. 10 ; Street v. Treadwell et al., 203 Ala. 68, 70 , 82 So. 28 ; Thomas v. McArdle, 207 Ala. 521 , 93 So. 395 .

The writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.