Opinion

Anniston Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. Hughes

  • 226 Ala. 654
  • 148 So. 124
  • 1933 Ala. LEXIS 411
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Mar 30, 1933
Status
Published
Author
Knight
On the bench
Knight, Anderson, Thomas, Brown
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 79.2%

The opinion

KNIGHT, Justice.

The complaint in this cause is composed of four common counts, and the record shows that the defendant demurred to the complaint, and to each count thereof separately and severally. On this appeal, the appellant, defendant in the court below, has assigned for error the overruling of his demurrer to each separate count of the complaint. However, in its brief, no argument is submitted in support of these assignments of error, or of any one of them. Under our uniform rulings we will treat those assignments of error as waived. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Hall, 223 Ala. 338 , 135 So. 466 ; Keeton v. Northern Alabama R. R. Co., 222 Ala. 224 , 132 So. 35 .

There is no bill of exceptions in this cause, hence we cannot here review the action of the trial court in giving the charge, at request of the plaintiff, which is made the basis of appellant’s fifth assignment of error. Nor can we review, for like reason, the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for new trial. Such errors can only be presented by proper bill of exceptions. •

It follows that the judgment appealed from will be, and is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, O. J., and THOMAS, and BROWN, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.