Opinion

in Re Bruce Stanley Griffin

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Jun 9, 2016
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 43.6%

The opinion

Opinion issued June 9, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-16-00344-CV

NO. 01-16-00345-CV

———————————

IN RE BRUCE STANLEY GRIFFIN, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Bruce Stanley Griffin, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in two

trial court causes, challenging the Brazoria District Clerk’s withdrawals from

Griffin’s inmate trust account.1

1

The underlying cases are The State of Texas v. Bruce Stanley Griffin, cause number

66035 and 66036, pending in the 23rd District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, the

Honorable Ben Hardin, presiding.

An appellate court has the power to issue a writ of mandamus, other than

against a district or county court judge, to enforce its jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T

CODE ANN. § 22.221(a),(b) (West 2004); In re Smith, 263 S.W.3d 93, 95 (Tex.

App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding). Relator is not seeking to enforce

our jurisdiction. Instead, he is seeking mandamus relief against the Brazoria District

Clerk for acts that do not relate to our jurisdiction. Accordingly, we have no

jurisdiction to grant the relief relator seeks.

We dismiss the petitions for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.