Opinion

Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

  • 635 Pa. 219
  • 134 A.3d 448
  • 2016 Pa. LEXIS 801
  • 2016 WL 1452101
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Apr 13, 2016
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 48.2%

The opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

GARY H. POWELL : No. 927 MAL 2015

:

v. : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

: the Order of the Commonwealth Court

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION :

BOARD OF REVIEW :

JOE KRENTZMAN & SONS, INC. :

:

Intervenor :

:

:

:

PETITION OF: UNEMPLOYMENT :

COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW :

:

:

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issue as stated by petitioner is:

Should a Commonwealth agency be required to allow a suspended

attorney to represent a party in its hearings and proceedings?

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s Application for Leave to File as Amicus

Curiae in Support of Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. Andrew J.

Ostrowski’s Application to Intervene is DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.