National Labor Relations Board v. Lunday-Thagard Oil Company

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The record does not support the respondent’s contention that it was deprived of significant procedural rights.

See

the Board’s Rules and Regulations, 29 C.F.R. § 102.69 (c.) (1973);

see also

NLRB v. Singleton Packing Corp., 418 F.2d 275, 280 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 824 , 91 S.Ct. 47 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 53 (1970); Sonoco Products Co. v. NLRB, 399 F.2d 835, 839 (9th Cir. 1968); NLRB v. J. R. Simplot Co., 322 F.2d 170, 172 (9th Cir. 1963). Upon the basis of the record and the Petitioner’s Decision and Order, reported at 203 NLRB No. 12 , the challenged Order will be

Enforced.