Opinion

Mireya Patino Garcia v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Mar 15, 2016
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Mireya Patino Garcia v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00939-CR

Trial court case number: 1952529

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 9 of Harris County

Appellant is represented by retained counsel, Chadrick Stewart Henderson. Appellant’s

brief was originally due on December 30, 2015. On January 19, 2016, the Clerk of the Court

notified appellant that a brief had not yet been filed and required a response within 10 days. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). No brief or motion for extension of time has been filed.

Accordingly, we enter the following order.

Pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8, we abate this appeal and remand the case

to the trial court for a hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2)–(3). We direct the trial court to

conduct a hearing at which a representative of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office and

appellant and retained counsel shall be present.1 The trial court shall have a court reporter record

the hearing. The trial court is directed to make appropriate findings on these issues:

1. Whether appellant still wishes to pursue this appeal;

2. If so, whether retained counsel, Chadrick Stewart Henderson, has abandoned the

appeal and whether the trial court should establish a date by which appellant shall

retain new counsel.

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04; TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3), (4).

The trial court shall cause a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings and

recommendations, including the name, address, telephone number, and State Bar number of any

1 If appellant is incarcerated, at the trial court’s discretion, appellant may participate in the hearing

by closed-circuit video teleconferencing. Any such teleconference must use a closed-circuit video

teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous compressed full motion video and

interactive communication of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any

attorneys representing the State or appellant. On request of appellant, appellant and his counsel

shall be able to communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the

attorney representing the State.

new retained counsel, and the reporter’s record of the hearing to be filed in this Court no later

than April 14, 2016. If the hearing is conducted by video teleconference, a certified video

recording of the hearing shall be filed in this Court no later than April 14, 2016.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when a supplemental clerk’s

record that complies with this order, and the reporter’s record of the hearing, have been filed in

this Court. The trial court coordinator shall set a hearing date and notify the parties and the

Clerk of this Court of such date.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually

Date: March 15, 2016

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.