Opinion

Glen Sumner v. Board of Adjustment

  • 637 F. App'x 841
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Mar 1, 2016
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Davis, Graves, Jones, Per Curiam
Nature of suit
Civil Rights
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Case: 15-20399 Document: 00513402332 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/01/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-20399 United States Court of Appeals

Summary Calendar Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 1, 2016

GLEN SUMNER, Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF SPRING VALLEY VILLAGE,

TEXAS; CITY OF SPRING VALLEY VILLAGE, TEXAS; ART FLORES,

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CV-244

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Glen Sumner appeals the district court’s dismissal of his action,

stemming from the alleged eroding of his property due to the actions of his

neighbor and the City of Spring Valley Village, Texas. In the district court,

Sumner asserted a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of his procedural

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 15-20399 Document: 00513402332 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/01/2016

No. 15-20399

due process rights, and further sought a declaratory judgment that the

certificate of occupancy issued by the city to his neighbor be withdrawn.

Sumner first urges this court to find that the district court erred in ruling

that he failed to state a protected property or liberty interest to support his

procedural due process claim. He further contends that the district court’s

determination that his declaratory judgment claim was unsupported by an

independent basis for federal jurisdiction was also error.

This court has considered this appeal on the basis of the briefs, the

pertinent portions of the record, and the applicable law. Having done so, the

judgment is affirmed, essentially for the reasons stated in the Order of the

district court.

AFFIRMED.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.