The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7223
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JERMAINE BROWN, a/k/a Jeezy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-10; 4:13-cv-00041-
RBS)
Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jermaine Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Timothy Richard Murphy,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Kristine Elizabeth
Wolfe, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News,
Virginia; Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Assistant United States
Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jermaine Brown appeals from the district court’s orders
construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized
successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it on
that basis, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Brown, Nos. 4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-10;
4:13-cv-00041-RBS (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2015; June 8, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2