The opinion
J-A34021-15
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
MARCIA THOMAS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant
v.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RICE
TOWNSHIP; MILLER J. STELLA, JR.,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUPERVISOR OF
RICE TOWNSHIP; GEORGE VENESKY,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUPERVISOR OF
RICE TOWNSHIP; DONALD ARMSTRONG,
INDIVIDUALLY ; THOMAS M. MARSILIO,
INDIVIDUALLY; TONI ROGAN,
INDIVIDUALLY; KEVIN ROGAN,
INDIVIDUALLY, RHODA ROWLES,
INDIVIDUALLY; ELAINE WALLACE,
INDIVIDUALLY AND WILLIAM L. HIGGS,
INDIVIDUALLY, DEFENDANTS
AND
JAMES A. BRANDO, INDIVIDUALLY AND
LOUIS KNOPELSKI, INDIVIDUALLY,
ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS
No. 1977 MDA 2014
Appeal from the Order Entered October 29, 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County
Civil Division at No(s): 2011-03374
BEFORE: PANELLA, J., OTT, J., and JENKINS, J.
JUDGMENT ORDER BY OTT, J.: FILED DECEMBER 08, 2015
Marcia Thomas appeals from the order entered October 29, 2014,
granting Appellees’ (William L. Higgs and James A. Brando) amended motion
for summary judgment. We affirm.
J-A34021-15
In its October 29, 2014, order, the court found the following: “[T]here
exists no [conspiracy] claims against Defendants Higgs and Brando since all
parties allegedly involved in Count X[]VI have been DISMISSED with
prejudice and/or by previous Court Order.” Order, 10/29/2014. Upon
review, we agree with the trial court’s assessment and conclude that it did
not err in granting the amended motion for summary judgment.1
Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order.
Order affirmed.
Judgment Entered.
Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary
Date: 12/8/2015
____________________________________________
1
Furthermore, we note Thomas’ deficient and obtuse brief, which remained
unclarified after oral argument, does not persuade us otherwise.
-2-