The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6655
PIPER A. ROUNTREE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TAMMY BROWN,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
HAROLD CLARK; JOHN JABE; WENDY HOBBS; D. RADCLIFF-WALKER; T.
COX; K. STAPLETON; D. CARTER; P. SOUKOP; MS. SWANN; S. HORN;
V. BOOKER; GENE JOHNSON; MS. SNOW; J. BLAND,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:11-cv-00572-GEC-RSB)
Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 5, 2015
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Piper A. Rountree, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis,
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Piper A. Rountree appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and her
Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Rountree v. Brown, No.
7:11-cv-00572-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2015; Mar. 26, 2015).
We deny Rountree’s motion for transcripts at the government’s
expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3