Opinion

Archie Richard Raines v. Grand Oaks Homeowners Association, Inc.

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Jul 28, 2011
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Opinion issued July

28, 2011.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of

Texas

NO. 01-10-00295-CV

____________

ARCHIE RICHARD RAINES, Appellant

V.

GRAND OAKS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 944364

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant

Archie Richard Raines attempts to appeal from the trial court’s judgment signed

December 18, 2009.

Generally,

a notice of appeal is due within thirty days after the judgment is signed. See

Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. The deadline to file a notice of appeal is

extended to 90 days after the date the judgment is signed if any party timely

files a motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to

reinstate, or, under certain circumstances, a request for findings of fact and

conclusions of law. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). To be considered timely, a motion for new

trial must be filed within 30 days after the judgment is signed. Tex.

R. Civ. P. 329b(a).

Here, the

trial court signed the final judgment on December 18, 2009. A motion for new

trial was due by Tuesday, January 19, 2010.

See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(a); Tex.

R. App. P. 4.1(a). The record

shows that appellant timely filed his motion for new trial on January 19, 2010.

Because

his motion for new trial was timely filed, the deadline to file the notice of

appeal was extended to March 18, 2010, which is 90 days after the date the

judgment was signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1). Appellant did not file a notice of appeal

until April 5, 2010. Appellant’s notice

of appeal was untimely filed. Without a

timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. See Tex.

R. App. P. 25.1.

Accordingly,

we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a),

43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions

as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Sharp

and Brown.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.