Opinion

in Re Charles W. Bishop, II

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Jan 19, 2012
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Opinion issued January 19, 2012

In The

Court of

Appeals

For The

First District

of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-12-00019-CV

———————————

IN RE CHARLES

W. BISHOP, II, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Charles W. Bishop, II, has filed a pro se petition for writ of

mandamus in this court. See Tex.

Gov’t Code § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see

also Tex. R. App . P. 52 . Relator complains of an order signed by respondent * dismissing two defendants in the trial

court. Relator requests that we order

respondent to withdraw the dismissal order and “reinstate” the defendants.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Panel

consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.

* Respondent

is The Honorable Reece Rondon of the 234th District Court, Harris County,

Texas. Relator has provided us with information

indicating that this original proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011 – 39834, styled Charles W. Bishop, II v. Bruce Robinson et.

al , pending in the 234th District Court, Harris County, Texas, the

Honorable Reece Rondon, presiding.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.