Opinion

Willie Talton v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Feb 2, 2012
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 42.2%

“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”

How later courts described this case

  • “A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Opinion issued February 2,

2012 .

In

The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of

Texas

NO. 01-11-00629-CR

NO.

01-11-00630-CR

____________

WILLIE TALTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 209th

District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1247617 and 1254440

MEMORANDUM

OPINION

Appellant,

Willie Derrick Talton, pleaded nolo contendere to the offense of robbery

involving bodily injury, and pleaded guilty to the offense of burglary of a

building with intent to commit theft with the additional plea of “true” to the

allegations in two felony enhancement paragraphs. The trial court found appellant guilty of

both offenses, found the enhancements true, and, in accordance with the terms

of appellant’s plea bargain agreements with the State, sentenced appellant to two

years’ confinement. Appellant filed a

pro se notice of appeal for both proceedings. We dismiss the appeals.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant

may appeal only those matters that were raised by written motion filed and

ruled on before trial, or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. Tex.

R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal

must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right

of appeal has not been made part of the record. Tex. R.

App. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certifications

are included in the records on appeal. See

id . The trial court’s certifications

state that these are plea bargain cases and that the defendant has no right of

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

25.2(a)(2). Appellant did not appeal any

pre-trial matters, and the trial court did not give permission for appellant to

appeal. The records support the trial court’s certifications. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because

appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss these appeals. See Chavez

v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals,

while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained

is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal

without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals

for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices

Higley and Brown.

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2( b).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.